Unveiling the Venom Agenda

Unveiling the Venom Agenda: Part 3 – Plasmids, Venoms, and the Hidden Truth Behind COVID-19 Vaccines

Welcome back to our ongoing series exploring the shocking revelations about venom proteins, genetic engineering, and their potential ties to the COVID-19 pandemic. In Parts 1 and 2, we delved into the foundational evidence suggesting that snake venoms and other toxins might be at the heart of what we've been told is a viral outbreak. Today, in Part 3, we're going deeper into the mechanics of how this could have been orchestrated through mRNA vaccines—revealing a web of plasmids, deliberate design, and foreknowledge by health authorities. All credit for this groundbreaking research goes to Dr. Bryan Ardis, whose tireless investigations have uncovered these disturbing connections. Dr. Ardis's work forms the backbone of this article, and I urge you to explore his original findings for a fuller picture.

The mRNA Myth: No mRNA, Just Venom-Instructing Plasmids
Let's start with a bombshell that challenges everything we've been told about the COVID-19 vaccines: There is zero mRNA in the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. According to Dr. Ardis's research, the plasmids in the two separate mRNA shots for COVID were used to instruct the human body to produce cobratoxin mRNA and other venom mRNA proteins. These aren't benign genetic tools—they're engineered to turn your body into a factory for toxic proteins derived from venoms.

Dr. Ardis believes that all U.S. health agencies were aware of this before administering these venom-laced plasmid vaccines to Americans. They knew that many human beings would possibly die within hours if both DNA plasmid COVID-19 mRNA shots were given at the same time, just like what happened to the mice in the study. This knowledge stems from experiments conducted decades earlier, as the NIH has stated. They already knew they had to give everyone two different shots with two different DNA plasmids for COVID. It was too risky to give them both at the same time.

To mitigate this risk, they put a distance of two weeks between the first and second mRNA shots for COVID, and only after the second shot would anyone be considered fully vaccinated. Dr. Ardis hopes we can follow this logic because, if so, the COVID-19 mRNA agenda should look more and more evil. If the initial Pfizer and Moderna shots did in fact contain only one of the two DNA plasmids, the body, as in the mouse study, could never have been able to produce the mature COBRA toxin mRNA. It would require a second injection of the other half of the venom protein.

That is what the second Pfizer shot in this scenario would have to contain: the other half of the COBRA toxin spike protein, to complete the venom spike protein mRNA in order to be produced in the body of the vaccinated. Dr. Ardis posed a critical question: Was there any evidence that the first and second Pfizer or Moderna shots were in fact different shots?

Color-Coded Deception: Evidence of Distinct Shots
This was Dr. Ardis's next line of inquiry. If the goal was to get the human body to make COBRA toxin spike proteins, for example, then it would be essential that all people receive both of the correct, but very different, DNA plasmid COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. If the first and second mRNA shots were in fact different and distinct, then the manufacturers would have had to somehow clearly label the two shots as different. This would allow those administering the shots to know which shot was being given on visit one or two.

Did Pfizer and Moderna create different mRNA vaccines and were they clearly marked, quote, week one shot and week two shot or something similar? Well, Dr. Ardis gives credit to Dr. Henry Ely and his research team for uncovering this. The documents from Pfizer and Moderna reveal that they did, in fact, clearly label the first and second shots in a specific way to make the persons who would be administering the vaccines quickly assess which one was to be given first and which one was to be given two weeks later.

Both companies used a color-coded cap system with each mRNA vaccine vial to make it easy for the administrators to know the difference between the first and second shots. Does this blow your mind? It did Dr. Ardis's—and mine too. Someone just assumed that the mRNA shots were all the same and that we needed two doses for these new technology vaccines to work effectively. Nope. The manufacturers were aware of their distinctiveness and had to ensure that the correct shot was administered at the right moment.

How many of you were told that you were getting two completely different shots? Why would Pfizer and Moderna go through the effort to create unique color tops if in fact shots one and two were all the same injections? The answer is they wouldn't have. It's important to note that COVID-19 boosters only require one injection. The animals in the referenced 2003 study were injected with both DNA plasmids, but at the same time, both plasmids in one shot, which of course resulted in the death of all animals within six hours.

The reason for the extreme negative reactions to so many booster shots may be because they are administering both DNA plasmids in a single shot. For many reasons, Dr. Ardis strongly cautions against anyone receiving any mRNA vaccines or boosters.

Beyond Cobra: Other Venoms and Historical Proof
Making history in genetic engineering, there were other venoms discovered in COVID-19 positive patients' blood, feces, and urine other than Cobra toxin. Dr. Ardis wanted to know if researchers had tested DNA plasmids infused with other venoms found in COVID-19 patients like Bungarotoxin venom protein, krait snake venom, and conotoxins (ocean cone snail venom).

He's not going to dive into these studies as much as the Cobra toxin DNA plasmid study—that one study should suffice to explain the science of DNA plasmids. These next two studies contain proof that animals and humans can make Bungarotoxin mRNA and conotoxin mRNA from DNA plasmids infused with those same venom proteins. These studies were also done in the two decades leading up to the pandemic.

In the accompanying PDF (which includes screenshots and web addresses for further review), Dr. Ardis shares a screenshot from the Bungarotoxin study from 1999, as well as the web address for further review of the study. Next up are a couple of screenshots of studies of a DNA plasmid using conotoxin venom protein from 2003.

Dr. Ardis is sharing these two studies to reinforce that Cobra toxins, Bungarotoxins, and conotoxins were all found inside COVID-19 patients' bodies. They are manufactured inside mice and can be manufactured inside the body of humans using DNA plasmids, and they have known this works for up to 20 years before COVID.

The Smoking Gun: Cobra Biologics and the Venom Industry
If you still doubt that snake venom or Cobra toxin could be inside DNA plasmids found in the COVID-19 mRNA shots, Dr. Ardis wants you to hear and read in the PDF the name of the company that made DNA plasmids for COVID vaccines. Based on the company's name alone, what do you think they put in their DNA plasmids? Love and hugs? The name of the DNA plasmid manufacturer that supplied plasmids for the COVID-19 mRNA injections is literally called, quote, Cobra Biologics, end quote. Dr. Ardis couldn't make this stuff up if he tried. As they say, real life is often stranger than fiction.

Since this article published in late 2020, Cobra Biologics has merged with the pharmaceutical company Charles River. You can find the web address to read the full article in the PDF that comes with this audiobook. Charles River, you should know, is in partnership with another pharmaceutical company in England called Venom Tech. There's a web link and screenshot for you in the PDF.

What do you suppose Venom Tech manufactures? Dr. Ardis quotes: "We are a global leader for venom research enterprises based out of world class laboratories at Discovery Park in Kent, United Kingdom. We are committed to helping our customers worldwide make pioneering advances in drug discovery, crop protection, and cosmetics." Venoms from creatures worldwide are being used for drug production, vaccines, insecticides, and even cosmetics.

Until recently, only a handful of individuals were even aware of this global yet seemingly secret industrial complex. Many doctors have no idea that companies around the world produce massive amounts of venoms to make the drugs they are prescribing, as well as vaccines, insecticides, and cosmetics. Dr. Ardis believes it's time for the medical profession to adopt universal venom poisoning testing for all patients. Billions of lives and humanity's global health depend on it.

Our food, water, air, pharmaceuticals, and personal cosmetics are being intentionally laced with venom proteins. Venom poisoning has been a global effort for years, and it's only intensifying, and too few people are aware of it.

Teaming Up and the Water Connection
In early 2022, Dr. Ardis teamed up with Stu Peters, Mike Adams, Scott McKay, and Ann VanderSteel to unveil his concerns, research, and belief that the pandemic was deliberately caused by polluting our water systems with venom toxins that created the sickness called COVID-19.

As he prepared for the first annual Healing for the Ages conference in September 2023, Dr. Ardis wanted to know if our government and federal health agencies had tested whether DNA plasmids could survive water treatment plant chemicals or not. His presumption was that these entities had to have conducted tests of water systems with plasmids years before 2020 to see if, in fact, plasmids could be delivered via water to citizens.

What do you think he discovered? Not only were they testing plasmid survival in water systems in America in the years prior to COVID-19, 2017 to 2019, but our government funded studies on how DNA plasmids reacted to different chlorine levels in water over those three years leading up to the pandemic. Furthermore, they were interested in discovering the consequences of introducing DNA plasmids into water at treatment plants. This was done by exposing them to UV light, either from the sun or technology, and treating the water with hydrogen peroxide.

Would these various things hurt the DNA plasmids or destroy them? Chlorine, UV light, and hydrogen peroxide are used to treat the water we consume every day in our homes. Naturally, the government would be curious about the stability of their DNA plasmid technology from water treatment plant techniques. They would need to ensure plasmid technology would travel from the water treatment plant, surviving the various water treatments. And then it would make sense why it's finally to your family, in your home, in your shower, in your bathtub, coming to your fridge and tap, before they announce their pandemic.

You can see a couple of these DNA plasmid water treatment plant research studies, and their web links conducted in 2017 and 2019, in the accompanying PDF. Don't dismiss the data.

Closing with Mike Adams's Defense
To conclude this chapter, Dr. Ardis leaves us with an article produced by the Health Ranger, Mike Adams, which you can also find, you guessed it, in the accompanying PDF. The article was a response to the strong negative reaction Dr. Ardis faced from the various media outlets, medical professionals, and scientists after his initial series with Mike, and his claims about venoms being able to be delivered in water systems to create the pandemic. Note, you can find the full article with the web link in the PDF. Dr. Ardis is grateful to Mike for his incredible support, his willingness to listen to his research, and his commitment to share his research with others.

As we wrap up Part 3, remember: This isn't just speculation—it's backed by studies, documents, and the pioneering work of Dr. Bryan Ardis. Stay tuned for Part 4, where we'll explore even more implications for our health and future. Share this if it resonates, and always question the narrative.